On Mar 6, 1:58 am, "Sanny" wrote:

and the like, without making quite so many of his
typical blunders. And I have made some constructive
suggestions to Sanny, though that was a while back.

Yes, I added many openings just because you played them. And also many
other things were improved in GetClub Chess by looking at your Games.

Indeed, my games at GetClub are so "awesome" that the
nearly-an-IM Innes fears to look at them, preferring instead
to pretend they do not exist, that I do not even play. :D


Play a game at:http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html

Still I feel there are many things to improve. Now, Only a good player
can find what improvements are needed as basic things are working
correctly.

For me even beginner is playing like a big monster and beating me
quite often. Today I played a game with Beginner Level the Game was
finished in 15 minutes and I was three pawns down. I overlooked my
pawns being killed.

Chess is supposedly 99% tactics. Right now I am in
a game at RedHotPawn where my opponent has "got me"
strategically. I believe I will be forced to give away at
least a pawn just to survive his attack and live to see
an endgame. Virtually all my other games there have
been decided by fairly simple tactics: my opponents
giveth, and I taketh away.

With computers, sometimes even the Beginner level
can be quite tough, in that it (presumably) never misses
a short-range tactical opportunity. The human player is
thus forced to "see" every possibility, which is not
exactly how we tend to play against each other. In
facing a human opponent of lesser strength, it is often
true that "if we can't see it, they can't either". But not
so with computers; here, even a gap of hundreds of
rating points is no guarantee of safety when it comes
to tactics. And as the saying goes, chess is 99%
tactics.

-- help bot