"Mark Houlsby" wrote in message
oups.com...


It is irrelevant to the issue of draw rates.

No, it isn't. GMs make draws because chess is a draw.

So you say, but you haven't offered *one* piece of evidence
in support of that.



Do you understand why errors in draws are important?

Sure. I analyse mine all the time, and I analyse others' all the time
too.


Wrong answer. I will repeat the question for you and make it
even more explicit. Why are errors in draws important *to
the question of why there are so many draws in GM chess*?

Got it now?

And please try to remember that repeating what is to be shown
over and over isn't evidence. Neither is a vague reference to
some Informator authority. I feel like I'm arguing evolution with
a fundamentalist.