STACKING THE DECK

Sam Sloan asks what is basically a rhetorical
question. Bill Goichberg appointed interested parties
such as Grant Perks and Louie Blair because... the
elections are on and because ... these people want to
keep control of the message going to USCF members.

Logical enough. Low, of course. And to be expected.

In the case of Louie Blair, Goichberg has selected a
real doozie. His specialty is searching old messages
in the e-graveyard and ignoring those that he wishes
to ignore while posing as an honest broker.

The long term project here is to replace Mike
Nolan who lacks the intellectual sophistication for
seamless censorship. Louie is not a bad start from
the viewpoint of the powers that be, and were it not
for the drug testing issue that prevents me from
rejoining the USCF I would dearly love to post at
the USCF Forum as a member and have my
postings routinely censored.

It would be fun.



samsloan wrote:
I have found out that anybody who tends to agree with me on the
overall issues has also been suspended from posting to the USCF Issues
Forum.

This includes Attorney Brian Lafferty who is always very careful not
to write anything that might be construed as a personal attack on
anybody.

There is nobody left to get the issues out. The only people still
allowed to post are Pro-Polgar people and Goichberg Sycophants.

Sam Sloan