Evidence of everything that happened above. That you wanted to get
Sam's posts deleted from Wiki.

I don't know if his posts had value or not. But whatever they may or
may not have been does not lessen your conspircy and participation.

You "got him" Louis. Own it. Brag about it! Don't run from it.
Rob


----

And I think neither Rob Mitchell nor I admire Mr. Sloan's overall
orientation nor frankness, Dr. Blair! But we perhaps admire fairness more
than we dislike his behaviors.

You are a victim yourself, and will play a role which is already not
respected, since without any supporter at all to your 'actions', and
indifferent to every other point of view, you nevertheless get to moderate
actions of others.

Are you not being set up as some sort of McCarthy-figure?

There are two issues which Mr. Sloan needs to address (1) his own management
role and responsibilities at USCF during his own watch, and (2) his jejeune
attitude to females. He shirks both.

But both have real impact on the chess scene, and both have been ducked. To
be fair to him, item (1) is also ducked by all other board members.

While what you have prosecuted by way of your 'help' explanations at Wiki,
is in fact a display that does nothing other than really helping Sam Sloan
to be seen as the evident victim of a form of political or personality-based
hooliganism.

What genius set this nonsense up deserves these attentions, not you!

For in some ways you play the role of patsy before them. Truly, are you
really indifferent to /all/ these different voices who suggest that, in
their opinion, there is something amiss in your behavior at Wiki, and do you
really not understand the context that this is important as a USCF
moderator?

Phil Innes