wrote in message
oups.com...
On Mar 22, 4:26 pm, "SBD" wrote:
To say it is Bill Brock is a really wild theory. You can think what
you want of Bill, but he has, in Phil Innes' phrase, always stood up
and owned his own words. [...]

What about this metrically lame parody, allegedly authored by yours
tr.., er, by Brock, yet published on RGCP under the name of another?

Les sanglots longs
Des salauds avares
Du Vermont
Blessent mon coeur
D'une langueur
Monotone.

Well, what about it? Its cod-French.

Surely you blokes also sorted out the anagram of the title? His own for
himself.

It is no mere anagram, it is his own prediction of himself - that he will
become famous and successful, and empty and [artistically] dead. His friend
Rimbaud took an admittedly radical alternate course.

I could else who wrote the ditties above, surely there isn't much doubt to
the nature of the imposters here [?] which is all of a pattern - derivative
mockery and beshat commentary ~ Victoriana!

I suppose 'objective' proofs of outer identity are necessary for those who
feel they are sufficiently abused to wish to prosecute. Whereas its
ontogenesis is well marked from a psychological perspective, indeed, so well
so it is predicatble to a pattern.

Phil Innes