On Apr 11, 9:24 pm, "Rob" wrote:

Bot,
Aren't you and I the same person?

Um, no. You are a complete patzer at chess,
while I (according to no less an authority than
Sanny) am "a star".


I am confused. Are you now atacking
yourself?

No. Only dimwits like Skippy Repa could confound
a patzer like you with a star like me!


Or am I attacking me?

In a way, yes. For example, every time you misspell
SIMPLE words like "attacking" as "atacking" (see above),
you undermine (a subtle form of attack) yourself indirectly.


Gosh. I just don't know. ANd since you

Note that only the first letter of the first word of a
sentence needs to be capitalized.

claim the Mr. Innes and I are the same person

The joke is that while you invariably defend him,
he often as not ignores attacks on you; this is not
entirely fair, IMO.


and others claim that
you and I are the same person then it holds as logic that you and Mr.
Innes may be the same person.

Um, no. Mr. Innes is a nearly-an-IM, while I am
merely a star. The difference lies in the nearly--
being-recognized by FIDE as a titled player, which
applies to him, but not to me. So far as FIDE is
concerned, I am persona non grata, whereas Mr.
Innes is, so he claims, a nearly-an-IM.


Actually since there is only one Polgar
sister according to recently published reports, maybe there is only
one chess player in the world? Sam Sloan is Bobby Fischer!

This only shows that published reports are not
reliable -- a fact which is already well-known by
those of us who can think, and thereby recognize
the obvious fact that a mere human has typed up
the contents of said reports. Humans are fallible,
ergo published reports are unreliable. The same
concept applies to books and even more so to
statistics. However, your assertion about SS and
BF has some rationality, in that both are similarly
mentally deranged and good at chess.

-- help bot