Ambitious Pawn?
On Apr 21, 2:10 pm, Sanny wrote:
1.d4 d5
2.c4 dc
3.Nf3 Nc6
4.d5 Nb8
5.e4* c6
6.Bxc4 cd
7.ed* e6
8.Bb5+ Bd7
9.dxe* Bxb5
10.exf7+* Ke7
11.fxg8=N+* Rxg8
12.Bg5+ resigns
1 -- 0
-- help bot
It was a easy win.
But it needn't have been. The obvious strategy
was not to fall for my cheap tricks via ...e6, but
instead to fianchetto the KB with: ...g6, ...Bg7,
....Nf6, ...O-O. (I know that my style is faulty,
but as it keeps *working*, I can't seem to help
myself.)
-- trick bot
|