Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rfeditor
Am I the only one who's getting awfully tired of
this droning redundancy? The ED (or someone working under his
authority) entered into binding agreements to pay for services
rendered. Those agreements did not require approval by the Board,
which is there to set policy, not to micromanage operations. If you
want to criticize the Board that hired Frank Niro, fine. That's
legitimate, albeit pretty pointless now. To suggest that the USCF
could or should repudiate contracts entered into by its CEO suggests a
certain, ah, lack of contact with the real world of the non-judgment-
proof.
|
Who was that ED or who was that person acting under his authority? Can
you provide the name of that mysterious person. What did he agree to
and when? Why has no paper record been found of this transaction? Why
did Miss P wait until months after the incidents in question and until
after she had taken the laptop computer prior to demanding payment?
Finally and perhaps most importantly why did Mr. G conceal the fact
that he had made this payment of $13,358.36 to Miss P from the board
then in office and from the current board until Mr. S discovered the
payment in the books and records of the USCF late last year?
Sam Sloan