On Jun 28, 9:14 am, "Chess One" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...

Phil

Hi Marcus





You wrote

In the meantime, I challenge anyone actually interested in what I wrote
to
note the high interest in subjects to do with children, and utter taboo
on
anything to do with themselves: and if there is anyone out there who
works
in the social sciences you will know what this means.
Phil Innes

I accuse Bill Hall, USCF Executive Director and USCF President
Goichberg of COVERING UP the molestation of children like the Catholic
Church. That is, members such as Sam Sloan (a convicted kidnapper who
served prison time) use his position to attempt to have sexual
intercourse with minor children at chess tournaments. This behavior is
supported by a pro homosexual crowd. The lack of background checks in
scholastic volenteers demonstrates that the Executive Committee, Susan
Polar included, wants to use children as sex objects.

Former USCF Delegates such as Sutter are CONVICTED SEX OFFENDERS.

Just to make a comment at this point: the idea of any Standard is that it
shall apply to all people, and be conducted impartially. The standard I
suggested is the normal one, and not even very stringent.

What is otherwise said or thought is less reliable than a standard
background check which also takes into account the relationship to the
person investigated of those consulted.

While I am not at all certain than any of these people are as you say - in
our society we do have a growing problem with illegal sexual predatory
activity concerning young people, and I think this must be noticed as well
as that there is nothing in particular to recommend chess as any sort of
exemption from this scrutiny.

There has been problems with church groups concerning children [not only
Catholics, BTW], and with Boy Scouts, and even Little League. One
organisation I work with said that in California 50% of their applicants are
rejected as not suitable mentors for children. A shrink friend says
[ironically] that in England 50% of child abuse is conducted by males [his
irony is males get all the bad press, but obviously the other 50% are
females!] Gay couples [male or female] are, for example, proportionally
/less/ likely to be sexually abuse than heterosexual couples, but only a bit
less, and certainly cannot be exempted.

Each of these groups above have now adopted voluntary measures above the
legal minimum requirement as a response to the Dark Side of this medium, the
internet, where so much more salicious material is now available, publishing
from relatively secure anonymity.

The implication for chess is that /without/ some level of self-screening,
such access as we may have to mainstream education will be impossible if it
is to involve the chess community. It is not my opinion that prominent
individuals need screening, since, also very evident in these matters, is
that abuse is as likely to occur from those in the closet as those people
who excite these subjects - even sometimes from those who want to repress
others' expression on these topics because it excites them, and they fear
their own reactions.

This point of view is rarely admitted as a fact by those with personal fear
of this subject, OR those who express it in the first place as being their
responsibility for exciting unwonted passions in others, yet the
relationship seems clearly established between these factors.

This is why, IMO, the subject is worth exploring, in sober fashion, and for
everyone having to do with children in chess. First of all we have to admit
there is a problem.

Cordially, Phil Innes



Former Executive Board member GM Albert was suspected of problems with
children while in office, similar to Sam Sloan.

Let's set the record straight: the USCF is run by a gay liberal group
of people who want to use children as sex toys in the name of chess.

Let's further DESTORY the 501c4 corporate entity, known as the USCF,
and replace it with a 501c3 entity.

You can't talk about children in chess without talking about
HOMOSEXUALITY and the pro gay support that Hall supports to teach
children to be GAY.

I am trying not to gay bash, but I will if forced.

Marcus Roberts
Permanent Delegate of St Kitts and Nevis to FIDE
former USCF Vice President- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -Phil

On St Kitts and Nevis, we can't even self screen. We must accept CHILD
MOLESTERS, appointed by FIDE, in order to join.

The real problem is that both I and my the President of the St Kitts
and Nevis National Olympic Committee (Mr. Bridgewater) were clearly
OFFENDED at these FIDE officials (Bill Kelleher) DEMANDING that

1. St Kitts and Nevis set up a scholastic chess program, as a
requirement for admission to FIDE
2. I issue illegal visits to Olympiads for illegal aliens as a
requirement for admission to FIDE, some of whom could be children.
These VISAS are sold on the open market as a ticket to illegal
immigration, for lots of money.
3. St Kitts and Nevis accepts that FIDE has a right to strip our
children naked and watch them pea.

We - in St Kitts and Nevis - don't want to be told by FIDE how to
start a national chess federation. I have no interest in giving the
folks from Barbados a chance to fly over to our country and STRIP our
children naked. It is offensive to our sovereignty. Chess is not a
chance to turn our children queer.

Before we admit a problem, look at the DEMANDS from Kirsan
Ilyumzhinov, President of FIDE. (above, #1, #2, #3). When I refused,
Kirsan tried to THROW ME IN JAIL and now has REFUSED US ADMISSION.

We will not tolerate the molestation of our children for the greater
glory of FIDE

The problem is HUGE, to the extent that my government has doubts about
joining a "family" of people who fly to our island, and DEMAND that
our children become sexual objects.

I take offense to the FIDE "family's" demands.. Kirsan is in bed with
so many pro homosexual interests he does not realize that the reason
the Caribbean is the most underdeveloped part of the planet Earth for
Chess is the sexual demands of FIDE.

I will not allow our children to be molested. We refuse to implement a
scholastic chess program, as FIDE has requested our government.

Let me say it: HELL NO to scholastic chess. The problem is TOO GREAT.

In my personal view, I do not object to homosexuality. I do object
when children are TAUGHT that being homosexual is ok. It is
inappropriate to use the game of chess as a pro homosexual sounding
board.

The arrogance of both American and FIDE officials is directly
proportional to the number of closet homosexuals in office. I support
a man or woman's right to choose their sexual orientation. I do not
support this game to turn our children QUEER.

Marcus Roberts
Permanent Delegate of ST Kitts and Nevis to FIDE