View Single Post
  #7  
Old September 1st 07, 06:56 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,alt.chess
samsloan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,895
Default "enforcement" vs. "strict enforcement"

From the BINFOS for August 28, 2007. Note that Randy Bauer and Jim
Berry seem to be the only two sensible people on the board:

I abstain.

RB

OK, the motion has passed 6-0 with one abstention.

Bill Goichberg

Chessoffice@xxxxxxx wrote:

In a message dated 8/28/2007 2:10:13 P.M. Eastern Daylight
Time, randybauer2300@xxxxxxxxx writes:

Well, if the ball starts rolling, I'll be the first to
applaud - unless it is a Sisyphus exercise, of course. For the time
being, I'll pass on strict construction.

RB

Is that a no vote or an abstention?

Bill Goichberg


JABerryCG@xxxxxxx wrote:

Actually RB according to Joel this motion is important
because it gives Bill and Susan something to agree upon and start the
ball rolling for a better USCF.
If it takes a mundane motion to jump-start this train,
then I vote yes to strict enforcement of the Issues Forum guidelines
by the FOC and ED.
Susan-congrats on progress with Eric Moskow!!!
We have 67 pre-entries for 10-SS Labor Day FIDE tnmt
in Stillwater (USCF chess city of 2007)
Got final financials yesterday-thx.
Jim Berry

Ads
 

Credit Card - Equity Release - Mortgage Calculator - Mortgage Calculator - MPAA