"enforcement" vs. "strict enforcement"
On Sep 1, 11:56 am, samsloan wrote:
From the BINFOS for August 28, 2007. Note that Randy Bauer and Jim
Berry seem to be the only two sensible people on the board:
I abstain.
RB
OK, the motion has passed 6-0 with one abstention.
Bill Goichberg
Chessoffice@xxxxxxx wrote:
In a message dated 8/28/2007 2:10:13 P.M. Eastern Daylight
Time, randybauer2300@xxxxxxxxx writes:
Well, if the ball starts rolling, I'll be the first to
applaud - unless it is a Sisyphus exercise, of course. For the time
being, I'll pass on strict construction.
RB
Is that a no vote or an abstention?
Bill Goichberg
JABerryCG@xxxxxxx wrote:
Actually RB according to Joel this motion is important
because it gives Bill and Susan something to agree upon and start the
ball rolling for a better USCF.
If it takes a mundane motion to jump-start this train,
then I vote yes to strict enforcement of the Issues Forum guidelines
by the FOC and ED.
Susan-congrats on progress with Eric Moskow!!!
We have 67 pre-entries for 10-SS Labor Day FIDE tnmt
in Stillwater (USCF chess city of 2007)
Got final financials yesterday-thx.
Jim Berry
Why not just shut the puppy down cancel the idiotic internet liability
insurance policy and use the $11,000/Year for worthwhile program?
|