View Single Post
  #10  
Old September 4th 07, 06:59 PM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,alt.chess
emoskow23@aol.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default "enforcement" vs. "strict enforcement"

On Sep 1, 12:56 pm, samsloan wrote:
From the BINFOS for August 28, 2007. Note that Randy Bauer and Jim


Berry seem to be the only two sensible people on the board:

I abstain.

RB

OK, the motion has passed 6-0 with one abstention.

Bill Goichberg

Chessoffice@xxxxxxx wrote:

In a message dated 8/28/2007 2:10:13 P.M. Eastern Daylight

Time, randybauer2300@xxxxxxxxx writes:

Well, if the ball starts rolling, I'll be the first to
applaud - unless it is a Sisyphus exercise, of course. For the time
being, I'll pass on strict construction.

RB

Is that a no vote or an abstention?

Bill Goichberg

JABerryCG@xxxxxxx wrote:

Actually RB according to Joel this motion is important
because it gives Bill and Susan something to agree upon and start the
ball rolling for a better USCF.
If it takes a mundane motion to jump-start this train,
then I vote yes to strict enforcement of the Issues Forum guidelines
by the FOC and ED.
Susan-congrats on progress with Eric Moskow!!!
We have 67 pre-entries for 10-SS Labor Day FIDE tnmt
in Stillwater (USCF chess city of 2007)
Got final financials yesterday-thx.
Jim Berry


jim , the audacity, congrats on dealing with me. She is dealing with
me inspite of youy, goichberg and the other negative self dealing
people at the uscf. Susan, should not be congratulated, I am not a
project, what are you talking about. In fact had you had the courtesy
of calling me when the us championship was planned we might just of
been friends, now, do not mention my name on a website ever again.
eric moskow. ps if I choose to post thats my business, your a
fiduciary what are you thinking.???? mr board member.

Ads
 

Compare Mobile Phones - Free Credit Reports - Electricity Suppliers - Debt Help - Ringtones