"Paul Rubin" wrote in message
...
samsloan writes:
So, in other words, Susan did not "win" the case. Rather, the case was
settled with Susan agreeing to withdraw her (meritless) claim, and
FIDE agreeing to pay the relatively small amount of $25,000, which
represented her attorney's fees in this case.

Settlements just about always include some face-saving bull****
verbiage. The way you figure out who won is by seeing who paid money
to who.

That statement is not remotely accurate. It neglects the fact that
even in arbitration there are costs that have nothing to do
with a case's merit.

Although Sloan himself may not have been successful in
collecting on his own meritless court actions, that does
not mean that nobody else has.