SEE NO EVIL, HEAR NO EVIL


Before getting to the crux, I am among those who
have seen no evidence putting Paul Truong's hands on
the keyboard of the False Sam and other messages of
that type. Until such evidence surfaces (as opposed
to geographical analyses and computer numbers that can
be jiggled by clever, if malign, hackers), it is
unfair to call for Paul Truong's resignation from the
Executive Board.


Until proof-positive "surfaces", LP says, it is "unfair" to
call for PT's resignation. A few years ago, hypocrite LP
took precisely the opposite position with regard to an evil
FIDE dictator who had been accused of masterminding
the assassination of one of his critics. No evidence was
presented against the FIDE ruler, apart from the fact that
he gained indirectly (if you pretend to ignore all of the
controversy the murder itself generated, all the backlash).

My take is that LP has no moral compass, nothing by
which to navigate such issues apart from whim and
whimsy, along with personal biases which bear no
relation to the issues at hand. When convenience
dictates, the great Parrthenium sees no evil, hears no
evil, and speaks no evil. But woe be unto those who
may have circumstantial evidence against them, if
there be enmity betwixt they and he! LOL


That said, the attempt by the usual gaggle of
politicians to close down discussion of whether Mr.
Truong or others are guilty of possibly fraudulent
behavior is ever so typical of the USCF political class.


So true. As of yet, no one has answered my query
as to whether or not it is "normal" for a non-profit org.
to take such measures, and I interpret this as meaning
that personal issues take precedence here over any
objective ones.


There is another possible scenario re the Truong
affair. It is possible that the USCF Old Guardist are
using Sam, who is the unwitting dupe here, to
undermine Polgar-Truong. he idea is to adopt a faux
statesmanship, involving censorship at the USCF Forum
and calls for prolonged investigation as a way of
positioning the Old Guardists as moderates who, at
long last, conclude that Mr. Truong ought to resign.


That made precious little sense, as it was not only SS
who was allegedly attacked, nor did SS require any
manipulation whatever to attack the PT/SP duo. (It
seems that it is in his nature to attack SP.)


This latter is an ancient insider trick.


One trick I have not yet learned is figuring out why
LP has chosen to support rather than attack Paul
Truong. Given all the "evidence" I have seen posted
here by LP's buddy SS, it is amazing that the former
would feign ignorance and take a position of trying
to ignore it and suggest that no evidence has yet
been "seen". In any case, one thing is certain:
once LP takes a position -- however ludicrous -- he
does not easily change his mind, regardless of the
pertinent facts. Thus, I expect to see a lot more of
this kind of SEE NO EVIL stuff in the near future.


Much of the stuff attributed to PT, I have not seen;
but going by the little I have read, an appropriate
punishment might be a spanking or else a time out.
That's because of the level of maturity of these posts,
which is clear evidence that the real culprit is no adult,
but a mischievous adolescent, reminiscent of the Grim
Repa (sans foul mouth). In fact, until I saw the posts
by Sam Sloan which correlated the culprit's/culprits'
location with the PT/SP duo, my guess was that at
least one of the impostors was probably JR.


-- help bot