ChessBanter - View Single Post

**Sanny**

On Oct 4, 6:43 am, help bot wrote:
On Oct 3, 5:34 pm, raylopez99 wrote:

It sucks. Seems like some tactical blunders on both sides. Why is
this good?

Please provide the PGN analysis by a chess engine then we can decide.
Here is a game between Zebediah and Master Level at GetClub.

It was for the first time Master was able to take 2 pawns. Still
Zebediah managed to win.

The problem seems to be that Sanny is not a strong
enough player to see that his Master level did not in
fact "take" two pawns only to later lose after a
tremendous comeback, ala professional wrestling.

My view is that his program simply can't defend and
this was deftly exploited by Zebediah, although not in
a particularly impressive manner. The finish reminds
me of computer play, which Sanny himself has opined
is a distinct possibility with Zeb. But I do not rule out
that this funky ...Qe8 business could perhaps be a
popular book-sacrifice line; I've seen worse. And there
have been occasions in which even weak players like
myself have spotted such tactics *OTB*. One such
game had me feeling very proud of myself for out-
sacrificing a decent opponent in an incalculable mess
of a position -- until I got home and Fritz showed me
two dozen improvements for both sides!

-- help bot

Could you analyze this game on Fritz

Bye
Sanny

Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html