"Chess One" wrote in message
news:tabNi.6008$PV1.37@trndny08...
"It seems that he has been out sick more
often than he has been at work."

Sam Sloan

---

Like most Sam Sloan posts, what is written above is not evidence. Neither
is it a fact. It is a suggestion, vastly overstated, but as always,
containing condemnation of others, as if what he 'asks' were actually
true. In this instance he merely restricts his non-factual statement to
the mild, for him, conclusion, about the Ex Dir being 'a lazy bum who
doesn't want to work'.

At least this is a different subject from the 'evidence', as we are to
understand it already is, that Paul Truong is so obsessed with him, that
he parades around anonymously as a pseudo-Sloan.

I can understand Sam Sloan's evident resentment that Paul Truong married
the pretty woman, who is a world champion of chess, who is in the major
media, including television programs on cognitive psychology, funded by
National Geographic.

Who wouldn't? )))

We all envy the guy a bit, no?

--a little pause in this diatribe-- my son, a 5th year engineering student
says that his [name-brand] engineering school have hacked everything,
every thing at every level. its a sort of joke thing among them. what
'experts' working with the non-profit uscf will understand, he said, is
not likely to impress him, and causes him some amusement -- okay, back to
the main psycho-drama

While Sam Sloan's rejected suitor orientation is as plain as day, does he
really think he is so central to chess that perhaps the most successful
promoter of it in the USA has time to, sort-of, mock him, as if he himself
were the *star* of it all, except in his own mind.

It is so psychologically implausible, [though not impossible] considering
Mr. Sloans soto-relationship with Mrs Polgar, that at any bar in the
world, guys would be nudging each other in the ribs, asking who the big
****** was?

Anyway, despite HIPPA, what exactly can this mean? And I'll put this
forward again

"It seems that he has been out sick more
often than he has been at work."

So... It /seems/ to Sam Sloan. But that is hyperbolous, surely, unless we
think he is innumerate, and can't count. Sam Sloan is stating that he
would prefer us to think as he would /seem/ to understand. Which is not
his real understanding.

In other words, he would like us to judge something known to him to be
false, as if it were not.

What's new?

Phil Innes

The issue is not motive for the fake Sam & Ray. The issue is the validity
of the evidence produced by Mothershead. Hopefully the full report with ALL
the factual data will find its way into cyberspace. Harry Payne ran the
initial data past one of his company's security experts, who said
Mottershead's bare bones first posting report evidenced an 80% to 95%
probability that Truong is the Fake Sam. Examination of Truongs computer
would be needed to prove that to near 100%. Truong very much appears to
have been caught red handed. The attempt to remove Usenet posts put extra
nails in the coffin. It should also come out that he slipped up during the
AOL period by making several posts using a non-AOL account that links
directly to him.

Despite all the hyperbole by Truong, , George you and other of his friends
and minions, facts are pesky little creatures that have been presented and
no reasonable defense has yet been offered---most likely because there isn't
any.