Subject: [fide-chess] Is Bill Hall really out sick again or just a lazy
bum who doesn't want to wo


On Oct 4, 3:29 pm, "Chess One" wrote:

the pretty woman, who is a world champion of chess,

To whom are you referring?

**Take a wild guess...

Surely not Polgar.

**ROFL - can this be an opportunity to [negatively] comment? ))

When did she win the
World Championship of Chess? I must have missed it in the news.


** I wrote /a/ world champion of chess, not /the/. Is reading the news
actually any use, if you can't unnerstan plain English?

chess that perhaps the most successful promoter of it in the USA

Who is the most successful promoter of chess in the USA?

**Take a wild guess

If you are
referring to Truong,

**Can this be an opportunity for a [negative] comment?

what has he promoted besides himself and his wife?

I thought Goichberg was the most successful promoter of chess in the USA.


**The reader is asked to understand the difference between promoter, and
organiser. I suppose both could be called promoter within chess realms, but
promoting chess in USA is rather larger than to the 80,000 USCF members, no?
There are getting on for 300,000,000 people outside chess - and I imagine
that none of them have heard the name Goichberg, whereas... but [I?]
digress... back to my own point.

Since you claim that "any hacker" can hack an IP address,

** Excuse me! That is not a quote! Where did I say 'any hacker?' Come on Mr.
Sloan, I don't have to play nicey nicey with you, and I just called you a
.... I think you know what.

why don't
you prove it by hacking mine? The Fake Sam Sloan never hacked my IP
address, although he surely must have tried.


** We seem to have some thread drift here, as if I am addressing a
tri-partite schizoid. (a) Sam Sloan does not address his own topic, which is
the header, (b) he takes gratuitous swipes at 2 other people, by willfully
midunderstanding what I wrote, as if I wrote something else, and (c) is the
third Sam Sloan, so speak, asking something or telling something?

**Should Mr. Sloan still not understand me, can it be assumed that that is
his intent. For other, what I have written is NOT about Sam Sloan - it is
about requiring proof of others to establish their innocence; it is
discussion of 'evidence' as presented by a partisan, and about the
scandalising of HIPPA employment rules, in the case of Bill Hall, and why
there are no dissenting voices for such disprespectful treatment of anyone.

**Now, only the Real Sam Sloan could confound and corrupt all 3 in one post.
Phil Innes

The Real Sam Sloan