"The Historian" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 8, 12:47 am, wrote:
Chess Group Officials Accused of Using Internet to Hurt Rivals

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/08/ny...l?ref=nyregion

Thanks for the link. The Times' coverage seems far more balanced than
the cheerleading and jeerleading that's made up the bulk of the rgcp
commentary. And I note the Times disclosed a connection between
themselves and a company mentioned in the article. Truong's Vermont
Defender, a hint for you.

Actual stalkers and misdirectors, unite! Here is yet another suggestion or
insinuation of something, [what?] or course, the writer is too careful to
make a plain statement since that would require a pair of balls.

I wonder if the same person ever impersonated anyone else, or went by
disguised names. I do believe he has. Of course, just because he has written
non stop trash in newsgroups for 5 years about other people, proves 80 to
95% of nothing.

---

I further suppose comment here by those who take the M out of MO, won't be
happy to notice this:

"These people started all these accusations the day after I criticized
them about their job performance,"

and they will continue to write about 'evidence' as if it were a synonym for
proof, and neglect to mention their own M in all this.

I think this is why, before rushing to conclusions over who is even the
victim of these vicious pranks, Sam Sloan or Paul Truong, a moments pause is
necessary, as if, you know, properly constituted agents would investigate
it, and also report within the normal sense of rules of evidence.

What other writers here care for due process and the law is as it may be,
and if indeed, as one writer has suggested, I am personally the only person
here to acknowledge its value, then, so be it!

Phil Innes