Two wrongs
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:45:49 -0700, Rob wrote:
I believe it would be fun to see the if "the information" also might
be damning to others who bore false witness in the USCF forum by using
identities not their own. I have heard it is so.
Good idea, Rob. Got any candidates? Let's out 'em. Sauce for the
goose and all.
By coddling Sloan
Coddling? Most of the posts I've seen start out with something like,
"Yes we know Sloan is a { crock | sleaze | serial litigant | old letch
| bad guy | other insult } but that doesn't excuse stealing his
identity and using it to flog others". This is coddling? The only
positive spin I've seen on Sloan is that one of his (many) accusations
may prove correct.
on this witch-hunt
Ain't you a little old to believe in witches? By "witch-hunt" one
usually means the evidence is unreliable or false. Is that what you
mean here?
|