"The Historian" wrote in message
ups.com...

Actual stalkers and misdirectors, unite! Here is yet another suggestion
or
insinuation of something, [what?] or course, the writer is too careful to
make a plain statement since that would require a pair of balls.

Ok:

"Phil Innes fails to disclose potential conflicts of interest, such as
his working with Susan Polgar."

Plain enough?

I said I had worked with the SPF. That doesn't mean I am its client, or it
mine.

Since both Susan Polgar and Paul Truong have worked with a vast crowd of
chess players and organisers from coast to coast, it seems to me the only
'conflict of interest' with any of these character witnesses, is to allow
them to speak what's true from their experience. Its a 'conflict' for others
since such witness is in conflict with often malicious speculation.

Who, ineed, in chess in the USA would not have a potential conflict of
interest in this sense - that they may have, do now, or could have a
connection with SP?

If Neil Brennan wants to ask something more directly, let his wit guide him,
best he can ....

Phil Innes