On Oct 10, 2:00 pm, "B. Lafferty" wrote:
"B. Lafferty" wrote in message

news:UJ7Pi.10471$br2.6897@trndny03...

I have been told that Ms. Polgar wrote last evening on her blog that her
expert had reviewed the evidence and found that it cleared her (and her
husband?).

It is my understanding that more than one expert has reviewed and/or is
reviewing the Mottershead Report privately. None have reached the
conclusion of Ms. Polgars's "expert."

Here is the xext of Polgar's statement:

"One test has come back fully clearing both of us. But due to the legal
nature of this case, I cannot comment further. As I said, I expect the judge
to dismiss this case. Many more facts will come out in due time.

Best wishes,
Susan Polgar"

Was this test done by an expert? If so, tell us who he is Susan and let us
see his report. I find it difficult that to beleive that an expert would
clear both of you. I do think you will be able to find an expert to testify
that the results of Mottershead's investigation are "inconclusive." There
are plenty of experts for hire in the computer identity field that give this
kind of testimony all the time. The key is to find two or three really
independent experts and let them review the evidence independently--then
compare their conclusions.

Was their expert Gregory?

However, I expect that she is right that the suit will be dismissed.
The shoddy, scattershot filing by Sloan naming defendants with no
involvement and including much extraneous unrelated asides and
innuendo does not bode well for his case.

I think a tightly focused lawsuit would be heard in court. But not pro
se nonsense. A real firm who could serve discovery on isp's and all
related parties and hire multitudes of expert witnesses is the way to
go here. What was filed doesn't stand much chance in my lay opinion.