"David Kane" wrote in message
. ..

"Mike Murray" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:30:17 GMT, "Chess One"
wrote:

The List of the Blind Monkey is one thing and one thing only: A
collection of goofy arguments actually made by people trying to ignore
or disregard the evidence gathered and presented by Brian Mottershead.

It in no way evaluates that evidence or pronounces guilt.

That is less than the truth! The fact is that you add your own dismissive
comment to each and every line, thus eliminating all. Phil Innes

Of course. All items on the List of the Blind Monkey represent stupid
arguments against Mottershead's material. An argument that wasn't
stupid doesn't make the List.

Now, here's the kicker, Phil. Something you've evidently missed.
Dissing a bunch of stupid arguments against evidence

(1) Doesn't necessitate the evidence being true or even reasonable

(2) Doesn't preclude the possibility of valid arguments against the
evidence.

Theoretically this is true, but in reality when people make ludicrous
arguments it is usually because there are no strong arguments to
make. Excepting Phil and Rob's contributions,

Except Phil and Rob's contributions, who actually know the people involved,
and witness to their character, there are no other contributions.

Phil

most of these
are not coming from stupid people - just disappointed ones with
the very human tendency of not wanting to face an unpleasant reality.

While I don't preclude the possibility of it happening in the future,
the number of even remotely credible alternate explanations
to date is zero.



I suggest you try your best to come up with reasonable arguments
against Motterhead's findings. I need some fresh items for my List.


I may discuss these issues elsewhere, and obviously have my opinions
based on what I've read thus far, but

The List stands alone, the List stands alone
And it sticks in your craw like a sharp fish bone
The List stands alone