On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 20:35:20 GMT, "Chess One"
wrote:


The idea that these are ideas are stupid, is your commentary, so far 23 of
them. And you do not phrase what you dismiss in the terms they are raised,
but by sarcastic dismmissal, which you can't own as your own action in this.

Actually, the list is up to 30 now. Read the last one.

So, Phil, you are saying the ideas in the list AREN'T stupid, that
they could be phrased in a way that makes them well founded? Well,
give it a shot. Use short, clear sentences, no funny words, eschew
the oracular and the cryptic, no weird punctuation, run a
spell-checker on it before you post it. Be, how they say,
"professional".

I'm happy to revise the list in case of error.

Now, here's the kicker, Phil. Something you've evidently missed.
Dissing a bunch of stupid arguments against evidence

What does that sentence mean?

Phil, it's not a sentence. It's a phrase. The sentence includes the
two list items below it, formatted for your reading convenience.

Or are you asking about the slang word "Dissing"? I thought you were
a street-wise kinda guy.


That is your own standard. You might get over yourself a bit to realise that
it ain't everybody's, and certainly no standard in law, and you are not a
judge and do not represent anything like any legal process. You are a
prosecutor of one point of view - admit it!

Sorry, Phil. I'm just a guy posting opinions on a newsgroup. Not a
judge, not a prosecutor, not an IM (not even close).


The List stands alone, the List stands alone
And it sticks in your craw like a sharp fish bone
The List stands alone