On Oct 11, 9:36 pm, The Historian wrote:
On Oct 11, 4:54 pm, Mike Murray wrote:

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:09:42 GMT, "Chess One"
wrote:

Theoretically this is true, but in reality when people make ludicrous
arguments it is usually because there are no strong arguments to
make. Excepting Phil and Rob's contributions,
Except Phil and Rob's contributions, who actually know the people involved,
and witness to their character, there are no other contributions.

Gee, thanks, Phil. I was beginning to think the well had run dry. You
just made the list again. Number 31. No other contributor even comes
close.

Remember to look at the LAST post to see the full, up-to-date list.

Innes objects to anyone pointing out that he "works with Susan Polgar"
or is connected to Truong, but he and Rob know them well enough that
they can "witness to their character?"

As Larry Parr would say,
"lovin' it!"

Isn't that the McDonald's catch phrase?Feel a Big Mac Attack coming
on?

"two all beef patties special sauce lettuce cheese pickles onions on a
sesame seed bun" "you deserve a break today, so get up and get away"
LOL