"The Historian" wrote in message
oups.com...

Innes objects to anyone pointing out that he "works with Susan Polgar"
or is connected to Truong, but he and Rob know them well enough that
they can "witness to their character?" As Larry Parr would say,
"lovin' it!"

Another lie from a liar who does not quote me, nor any context for his
statement.

I do not object to it. I wrote it. What's the matter with that? Brennan of
course, cuts the rest of the message since he prefers to distort
everything - and here I think he is very willing to deliberately in public
distort the path of justice.

Brennan has a

DEMONSTRATED stalking pattern hint on several fixed subjects.

And if I catch a few rascals here who are drawn to this subject, by the
strange means I employ, I don't care if no-one else thinks at all. If no-one
thinks Brennan's behavior [not what he says, but how he behaves] deserves
special attention, special in this instance, then no-one thinks anything
much.

Has Neil Brennan ever written anything about chess that does not seek to
stir up hatred among other posters? Can he write 3 messages without abusing
someone? Or resort to distortions and lying? Pick any 3!

This is all about you Neil. Really! people are noting these interactions.
Pity you accused me of abusing my own family, after Xganon, who actually
only followed your posts.

Curious!

Phil Innes