On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:17:03 GMT, "Chess One"
wrote:


So, Phil, you are saying the ideas in the list AREN'T stupid,

No, I am saying you dismiss them. Which is what you cut. You make them
stupid, as it were. That's all.

No, Phil. I just molded them into a slightly different shape. Kinda
like sculpting a turd.

Dissing a bunch of stupid arguments against evidence

What does that sentence mean?

Phil, it's not a sentence. It's a phrase.

Actually two sentences, each with verb and subject...

The part you asked about was a phrase.

I am asking about your evident and rather willful dismissal of what other
people write - eg, 'stupid arguments', which, right or wrong is your, Mike
Murray's, dismissive comment. right?

Well, sure. I dismiss them 'cause they're stupid. What should I do
-- fawn over them?

And sure, people say things which are not perspective, yet you have
eliminated ALL 20+ things that others have said.

This sentence doesn't make sense as written, but I'm inferring you
believe a list good statements could be constructed. Have at it,
then. Instead of "The List of the Blind Monkey", build your own "List
of the Bug-eyed Parrot" or whatever. Publish it. As Perot said,
we're all ears.