On Oct 13, 10:11 am, Mike Murray wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 07:49:43 -0700, Mike Murray

wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 05:32:38 -0700, The Historian
wrote:

In case it's not obvious, I was responding to Phil. The Historian
had quoted a long chunk of Phil's detritus and I should have pointed
by newsreader one click up the chain.

My apologies, Neil.

No apologies needed, Mike. Perhaps I'm at fault for quoting Innes'
word-scat.

Meanwhile, I see Innes is back to his usual ad-hom routine. Doesn't he
realize that we all know ad-hom is his only method of debate, and so
we are hardened against it?