On Oct 14, 2:00 am, Mike Murray wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:58:05 -0700, The Historian

wrote:
Meanwhile, I see Innes is back to his usual ad-hom routine. Doesn't he
realize that we all know ad-hom is his only method of debate, and so
we are hardened against it?

I have to disagree with you on this. On occasion, he employs denial,
obfuscation, assertion, begging the question and non-sequitur..
Probably others.

You are right, Mike. Ad hom is merely his weapon of last resort. And
when responding to me, his weapon of choice.