On Oct 24, 5:44 am, wrote:

Now, you claim that I made an "equivalent statement in the BINFOs".
That is not true and the BINFOS are just for the board members, not
for you.

Phooey! Several posters here in rgc have been posting
materials they say are from the binfos, for years.


The non-confidential BINFOs are public record. You repeatedly used
them to posture during your term on the Board. When you were called to
account for using photographs on your web page likely in violation of
copyright and certainly in violation of your duty of loyalty to the
USCF, you attempted to avoid censure by telling your colleagues that,
if the matter were pursued, you would be "forced to reveal" (by whom?)
that your relationship with the (then underage) Susan Polgar had been
"not entirely Platonic." This is public record; you can't wriggle out
of it. Of course, you can claim now that you were lying then. I don't
suppose it could lower your credibility.


Trust me: it would be very difficult for Mr. Sloan to
lower his credibility here any further than he already
has. He would probably need to consult with IM Innes
and work out a game plan in order to do that. Imagine
what could perhaps be accomplished if these minds
were to "work" together... .


-- help bot