View Single Post
  #2  
Old October 27th 07, 07:09 AM posted to rec.games.chess.politics,rec.games.chess.misc,alt.chess,rec.games.chess.computer,misc.legal
marcuswroberts@hughes.net
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,470
Default Gregory Alexander keeps defending Paul Truong

On Oct 27, 12:58 am, samsloan wrote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregory
Hi Mike,

Even if someone posted as you, making a non-confrontational post here
would not tip the owner off. How many times do we review our own
posts?

Also, if the hacker has access to the email account, he or she would
have all of the IP addresses. If the hacker went further and installed
a key-logger, he could take over the very computer of the owner and
post away without the real owners knowledge. There are other numerous
ways to go about this once you break into their account.

As you can see, it is easily done.

Gregory

Don Schultz went nuts when it happened just one time that somebody (or
possibly Don himself) posted a BLANK empty message to this group. Don
demanded that Mike Nolan investigate.

Do you really think that anybody would believe that a Fake Paul Truong
could have posted to this forum hundreds of times during the election
campaign and the real Paul Truong who was also posting here never
noticed it?

By the way, nobody here seems to know what Paul Truong is claiming. Is
he claiming anything, or is he just hiding out?

Sam Sloan


Sam

I find it quite interesting that Texas Tech is defending Paul for "not
having time" to make over 2,000 posts.
The posts started in 2005, and Paul only started working for Texas
Tech this year. So, Texas Tech
isn't aware of the time frame involved. Paul has fed so much bull****,
that nobody at Texas Tech
has spent the time to investigate the charges, except possibly the
police. How does Texas Tech
know what Paul did with his time prior to his employment with Texas
Tech?

The sitaution is absurd!

Marcus Robertrs

Ads
 

Loans - Mobile Phone - Art visionaries - Hotels in Krakow - Payday Loans