On Oct 28, 12:56 pm, "Chess One" wrote:
I find it amazing when those who are a queen down in the endgame claim
that they are winning when the rest of the world can see that they are
losing.

**Three pawns down, in a losing endgame, Sam Sloan relies on a dozen
opposite colored lawyering advocates posturing away in a usenet kangaroo
trial, to maybe get a draw? Common decency, plus the rule of law seemingly
being the objectionable game of the Polgar Gang.

comparison ot War in Iraq, snipped

active complaints to alt.chess,rec.games.chess.computer,soc.culture.mag yar
also snipped, since Sam Sloan continues to find their objections to
cross-posting 'amazing'

Now, we are having the same sort of things going on here in the Polgar
Wars. The Polgar Group has taken to declaring victory. Kind of reminds
one of the way that George W. Bush declared the "end of hostilities"
in Iraq. Here are some examples:

**A shame to abbreviate such deep thinking - but the loser here is chess
itself. There can be no winners, unless these witless actions for which
Sloan himself is a sacrificial pawn, represent an eventual leveling of the
federation itself - so what is both good and bad about it, all dissapear.

**What else Sam Sloan cares for than himself is entirely unknown, since he
has never written a disinterested comment about chess in his life. He is
either the Hero, or, if frustrated in the latest attempt [some 1,000 heroic
actions this past year alone], then some others are proven the very Devil's
deisciples for frustrating him, with their... sobriety?

Phil Innes
Vermont

Phil

Stop this: "Common decency, plus the rule of law seemingly
being the objectionable game of the Polgar Gang."

Paul Troung has threateend to kill me, about 20 times. These people
understand nothing but
hatred. IT's high time they learn to take what they dish out. I reject
your statement.

Marcus Roberts