On Oct 31, 8:14 pm, Taylor Kingston wrote:
On Oct 31, 2:22 pm, Rich Hutnik wrote:



On Oct 31, 1:19 pm, David Richerby
wrote:

Rich Hutnik wrote:

With all this lawsuit business and whatnot, I am curious how
Mr. Sloan can help improve the state of chess. Mr. Sloan, can you
speak up please?

Please take this to rec.games.chess.politics, where it belongs.

Dave.

Sorry. All I read regarding chess is rec.games.chess.misc, and
considering how many times Sam Sloan (or is it a fake Sam Sloan?)
posts on here, I figured asking how Sam Sloan would improve chess was
a relevant misc topic.

Rich, you may not be as familiar with Sloan as most rec.games.chess
regulars are. Virtually everyone here, with the lamentable exception
of Larry Parr, will tell you that Sam has no genuine interest in
improving chess. His only interest is in drawing attention to himself.
He simply uses chess and the USCF as a means to that end, along with
pornography, racism, and his various other interests.

Ok, thanks for the info. I popped into chess.misc out of getting
interested in chess again, and I see the swarm of Sloan posts on here,
so I was curious about who the heck Sloan is, and why Sloan matters.
I am also a bit confused what Sloan wants. Sloan just wants packback
or does Sloan want to become officer of U.S Chess Federation again?

Actually maybe I should just not give a damn and drop off here for 6
months or so until Sam gets bored.

- Rich