On Nov 2, 7:27 pm, Taylor Kingston wrote:

But the way you wrote Taylor was as if you said it was 2300 OTB. That's all.

No, Phil. I never said that, in any way, express or implied. That
was Sloan's leapt-to conclusion, which was exactly my point at the
time, to demonstrate the extreme shallowness of his investigative
technique. And in using the term shallow, I am being charitable.

I don't credit Mr. Sloan with conducting a shallow investigation.

I think he, like another mindless drone here, is toeing the line
drawn by Larry Parr. I think these drones are either unable or
else unwilling to *think for themselves*, so they get drawn into
the LP cesspool. Of course, since they cannot think for
themselves, they cannot be held accountable for following
orders like all good drones.


In any event, you are hardly in a position to comment, with your
claim to being "nearly an IM rated 2450." This is rather like
Mussolini calling someone a fascist.

Poor analogy. IMO, one is a case of flawed math, while
the other was obviously a case of *deliberate deception*.

So we need to make an analogy where one guy accidently
shoots someone by mistake, while the other guy (the one
corresponding to IM Innes) can be axe-murderer Lizzy Borden.


-- help bot