"help bot" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Nov 3, 5:45 am, "Chess One" wrote:

My writing about my rating was sloppy, so was yours. Mine was because I
was
writing to non-chess players, who don't even know which way the ELO scale
goes, up or down.

For that excuse to work, you would need to have written
something along these lines:

"I once was among the top 1% of all casual chess
players worldwide, IMO; this makes me an expert, so
you should listen to me, not to Nil Brennan, who is a
relatively weaker player."


Instead, what you wrote made very specific claims,
including assigning yourself an imaginary rating of
2450

wrong. plain wrong. almost at im level, that's all

but what the hell is it to you - other than envy? ))

-- a number you now insist was meaningless

of wrap it up! stop obsessing! if you want to play then do so - the rest of
these obsessionals about other people are just sicko made up
missunderstandings by patzers - you included

to your intended victims/audience (so why bother
inventing it?). It makes for a good story, but the
inconsistencies ruin the plot. For one thing, most
people are not even able to decipher whether a
higher number or a lower one is superior here, as
it could be that zero represents perfection, and GK's
2800+ means he has a long way to go to catch up
with Rob Mitchell.

uh... whatever that means

shrug

for heaven's sake, as an illustration to non-chess players [don't believe
brennan's context, who is constant liar] that whatever he thought [which was
insane!] is not clever chessic opinion, then we have 3 years of trash from
the likes of you

you tried playing chess once in the same place I do, and you scored what?
1300? but you have 3000 level opinions

if you don't understand the reference by now = go ahead and say what it all
/must/ mean to your understanding another 4 years if you want,
alternatively, get a life, patzer! and stop polluting all these threads with
your /obvious/ resentments

pi



-- help bot


P.S.: I recently laid claim to 1350 on GetClub, but
lo and behold, my memory failed me! I am not only
below that number (as help bot), but I am locked up
so that I can't get over it and pretend the slip-up
never happened. (grumbles to self)

Hence, I must resort to Plan B: I of course meant
that my peak rating (as nomorechess) was over 1350.
There -- that should fix it.


P.S.S.: Whew! That was a close one.