On Nov 3, 1:57 pm, The Historian wrote:
On Nov 3, 10:11 am, "Chess One" wrote:

For Gawds sake!

How many times will Brennan wholesale his lies? Playing strength of around
2400 for a couple of seasons over 25 years ago.

Again, that's not what you wrote:

***************
I must qualify what I have said therefo from the resolution of the
painitng on my monitor I can't tell Kings from Queens for white or
black,
but given the worst placements from white's perspective, I would still
hold
these views, [even though black is holding a piece in the air].

My qualifications for saying so is that I was nearly an international
master, with a rating of 2450, which is a tolerably qualified level to
offer
an opinion - for example, Nil, who used to post here before splitting,
so to
speak, was a player of about 1400 rating, and this "ELO" scale is not
linear. This is not to say that Nil could not also resolve the
situation
over the board - but given the best imagined placements for black and
the
worst for white, it is hard or even impossible to assert "mate-in-
three" if
a board position cannot be resolved.

Phil
****************

If anyone is looking for a lying obsessive hate-mongering stalker, voila!
[but who is?]

Stop quoting your business cards, Philsy.

So you are still claiming to have been "nearly an IM".

How come you refuse to play me a chess match for $1000 cash?

Sam Sloan