On Nov 4, 4:03 am, samsloan wrote:
On Nov 3, 11:16 pm, Rich Hutnik wrote:





On Nov 3, 10:47 am, Taylor Kingston wrote:

On Oct 31, 1:19 am, Rich Hutnik wrote:

With all this lawsuit business and whatnot, I am curious how Mr. Sloan
can help improve the state of chess. Mr. Sloan, can you speak up
please?

We're still waiting for Sam to reply to Mr. Hutnik, the original
poster. So far in this thread, Sloan has done nothing but dredge up
old ad-hom attacks on me that were refuted years ago. He has thereby
provided nothing but support for my view, that he has no genuine
interest in improving chess, only in slinging mud. I'd say that if he
ever had any chance to get Mr. Hutnik's vote, he's lost it now.

Considering I sent Mr. Sloan two emails in September, before running
across this All Sloan All the Time newsgroup(s), and he never wrote me
back, I wouldn't be surpised Mr. Sloan ignored my question, which is
why it was phrased in the third-person and not addressed to him.

- Rich

I do not recall ever receiving an email from you.

I get more than one thousand emails per day and I do not read all of
them.

Sam, you can eliminate all the porn-site come-ons and male-
enlargement ads with a good spam filter. You should then be able to
handle with ease the few remaining messages, if in fact there still
are any.