On Nov 4, 4:03 am, samsloan wrote:
On Nov 3, 11:16 pm, Rich Hutnik wrote:



On Nov 3, 10:47 am, Taylor Kingston wrote:

On Oct 31, 1:19 am, Rich Hutnik wrote:

With all this lawsuit business and whatnot, I am curious how Mr. Sloan
can help improve the state of chess. Mr. Sloan, can you speak up
please?

We're still waiting for Sam to reply to Mr. Hutnik, the original
poster. So far in this thread, Sloan has done nothing but dredge up
old ad-hom attacks on me that were refuted years ago. He has thereby
provided nothing but support for my view, that he has no genuine
interest in improving chess, only in slinging mud. I'd say that if he
ever had any chance to get Mr. Hutnik's vote, he's lost it now.

Considering I sent Mr. Sloan two emails in September, before running
across this All Sloan All the Time newsgroup(s), and he never wrote me
back, I wouldn't be surpised Mr. Sloan ignored my question, which is
why it was phrased in the third-person and not addressed to him.

- Rich

I do not recall ever receiving an email from you.

I get more than one thousand emails per day and I do not read all of
them.

Sam Sloan

I emailed and email address at ishipress.com, which might explain it.
It was the only email address I found related to you. Ok, that is
understandable. I am not going to post it here now.

Anyhow, I posted my question so maybe you could speak out for yourself
on why you want to smack down the U.S Chess Federation, Polger and so
on, and to what end. I am curious what your motives are and so on, as
your messages are dominating a newsgroup, and all it appears to be is
a ****ing contest by an irate individual to accomplish selfish ends to
me. I don't see how the cause of chess is advanced in any way here,
which is why I ask.

- Rich