On Nov 7, 8:43 am, SBD wrote:
On Nov 7, 6:03 am, " wrote:



That issue has been rehashed ad infinitum and most scholars now agree
with Larry Evans's analysis of the games in his groundbreaking article
THE TRAGEDY OF PAUL KERES (Chess Life, October 1996).

Can a list of these agreeing scholars be produced?

As we expected, Parr has failed to name a single one. As far as I
know, none exist. Meanwhile, here's a scholar who definitely does
*not* agee with Evans:

http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/extra/evans.html