"Taylor Kingston" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Nov 12, 1:28 am, " wrote:

EVANS ENVY

"Larry Evans: Stylist, Essayist, Searcher"

EVANS AS STYLIST

EVANS AS ESSAYIST

EVANS AS SEARCHER


This typical Parr orgasm of sycophancy brings to mind a hilarious
National Lampoon article from a few decades back,

Its always interesting to see what things make Taylor Kingston remind to
himself. Typographic errors remind him of the death of Mussolini, though
sometimes, Stalingrad.

I thougth just a few days ago we were going to get 'facts' as he himself
suggested was his goal, and after an article length post, didn't mention any
at that time. I even doubted we would identify whatever the topic was.

What we see practiced by such netwits as Kingston and Brennan - an example
is this post, but almost any will do - is to completely eliminate the chess
content, and, presumably while sober, writing about mayonaisse.

You would almost think that a 5 year vehement e-mail campaign didn't exist.
But it certainly did. The last time Kingston showed up to rubbish others was
on the subjects of, guess who? It was Winter again! Then it was about USCF's
copyrights which Winter had claimed.

I sent a formal note to Chesscafe stating that if this was a real claim to
speak up - and Hanon said sweet nothing at all.

about "White
Rastafarians." Instead of ganja their sacramental substance was
mayonnaise, and instead of Ethiopia's Haile Selassie as their messiah,
they worshipped Prince Rainier of Monaco, bestowing on him such titles
as "Lion of God" and "Emperor of Rome."
It would not surprise me at all if our Larry is seriously
entertaining the idea of a similar Evans cult with himself as high
priest.

Very little surprises our Taylor, except as we see, actual scholarship. He
should keep reading where he does, above, since it suits his temperament.
The very idea of a collaborated scholarly approach, with a rational basis
[which is to say, some agreed proportions of what to what] is a subject so
far beyond his experience, it wouldn't matter if the Pope plus 7 heavy
Fide-affiliated Cardinals showed up to support Evans' opinion of perfidious
Soviets.

But I forgot! That is not his beef with Evans - it is so much simpler. Evans
wouldn't continue to support his letter writing in CL, and should Taylor
Kingston not understand why that is, he could post the article in question
here - then people can see how many facts as we know them are presented, or
indeed if Kingston should instead try his luck with Lampoon.

Phil Innes