"Taylor Kingston" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Nov 12, 6:43 pm, " wrote:
THE KINGSTON GAMBIT

Not only does this farceur ignore his lie to Richard Laurie that he
wasn't aware of the dispute between Evans and Kingston, [SIC]

Now that would *indeed* be farcical, for me to be unaware of a
dispute involving myself. Is our Larry in his cups? One supposes he
meant "between Evans and Winter." However, as I have already noted in
this thread, I never made any such statement to Richard Laurie, nor to
anyone else.

Although you may have stated other reasons to contact someone - such as
wanting to speak with Laurie on Alekhine?

This is sheer fabrication, something Parr does quite
frequently.
Larry -- please supply to the rec.games.chess readers the quote
which supposedly shows me professing ignorance of the existence of a
dispute between Evans and Winter, or between Evans and myself. You
must do this, Larry, or die a chicken.

Was it Peter Kurzdorfer who refused your letter to CL? For example, did you
write this to me on
Saturday, February 16, 2002 12:22 PM

In fact, I see the stem here to be "Chess Life, March 2002, continues the
discussion by
printing a letter by Richard Laurie of Pennsylvania citing Krylenko's
influence on Stalin to bribe and cheat "as a matter of national policy."

As someone wrote me, and then a double misrepresentation of the someone.

I just can't figure out what your issue is - if you do not contest the
issues raised by Evans by your own researches, then you [rightly or wrongly]
seek redress for the discontinuation of your correspondence on the subject
in CL.

But your writing dances in between the 2 subjects, as if to validate one is
to validate the other.

Phil Innes