"SBD" wrote in message
...
On Nov 15, 3:43 pm, "Chess One" wrote:

Again, Phil, it seems you simply wish to cloud this in rhetoric.

I have absolute proof positive of what Larry Parr says from my own
correspondance [rather, his with me] with Taylor Kingston.

The question of whether Keres threw games now comes down to what some
C player playwright thinks?

Or B player Kingston?

What is it you contest Dr. S? The fact of Soviet era conivances in a
coerecedc environment, or some specific related to Keres Botvinnik? Say more
and so shall I.

I don't see anything in his letter that
reveals a thing to me beyond what I already knew. Kingston's opinion
is already transparent, this throws no new light on anything.

Nolens volens. What is the topic of these comments?

There is
no smoking gun here, just two disgruntled posters who want to smear
Kingston for one obvious reason

Too obvious to say?

and well, your reason, I suppose is
the same - he disagrees with you.

?

If you don't know who looks silly in this debate, well there is the
old poker analogy, " Look around the room for the sucker, if you can't
find him, its you."

there are always analogies possible, and there are those who can only resort
to them

You concluded aptly - there is little you can speak to as the facts
are clear - all that is left is posturing.

I know absolutely the facts of what I speak, and inquire of you, what is
your topic?

Is it Soviet fixing?

Come, come! If you wish to engage me on any topic, please to name it.

Phil Innes