Larry Parr wrote (Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:03:59 -0800 (PST)):

7 ...
7 Mr. Laurie's statement regarding whether our
7 NMnot impugned GM Evans' analytical ability was
7 couched in conditionals and spoke of what seemed to be
7 the case and what was implied.
_
_
What about this other statement?
_
"OPEN LETTER FROM RICHARD LAURIE (April 2 2006):
_
'...
... All anyone has to do is read Kingston's article in Chess
Life (about Keres throwing games to Botvinnik in the 1948
World Championship] to see that he denigrated Evans'
ability to analyze by saying Nunn was the better player.
...'" - Larry Parr (Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:24:27 -0800)
_
_
Larry Parr wrote (Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:03:59 -0800 (PST)):

7 I agree with Mr. Laurie that the implication can be found
7 in what NM Kingston wrote,
_
_
Is Larry Parr prepared to be specific about where he found
the "implication"? Does LP find it where Richard Laurie
reported it to be?
_
_
Larry Parr wrote (Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:03:59 -0800 (PST)):

7 and the adjudication here will be made by forum readers.
7 ...
_
_
"Nunn is 'generally considered a stronger player than
Evans'" - Larry Parr presentation (Thu, 15 Nov 2007
08:05:37 -0800 (PST)) of a Richard Laurie description
(March 2, 2002) of what Taylor Kingston wrote (1998)