"Taylor Kingston" wrote in message
...
On Nov 15, 6:09 pm, "J.D. Walker" wrote:
Chess One wrote:
"SBD" wrote in message

Come, come! If you wish to engage me on any topic, please to name it.

Phil Innes

Of course if Mr. Innes does not like the topic you name he may respond
to you as he did to me:

"So **** off, unless you get off on this subject..."
--

Cheers,
Rev. J.D. Walker, U.C.

Rev, you have just received an rgcp "baptism of flaming," and come
out of it in good form. Long-time observers of our Phil know that he
has definite problems involving disagreement and anger-management,

Here comes Darth Vaguer Kingston to encourage more rubbishing of people who
think continuing to exite the topic of porn-video fantasies on a chess
newsgroup are more than regretable by the 'Reverend' here.

not
to mention other serious issues. Along with Parr and Sloan, he forms a
sort of Unholy Trinity here, though that's not quite the right way to
put it, since it gives the impression they are important. The Bard put
it better when he spoke of "sound and fury, signifying nothing."

Kingston! Didn't you just get caught lying again? Is that why you are angry?
What a massive ego to carry a slight for 9 years, then on being challenged
be /proved/ wrong the very next day. From your private writing I didn't have
any doubts, but now its in the open, eh!

After all - if you will commit to this sort of dialog in public... [!]

You and the 'Reverend' have a nice conversation now, you already agreed your
subject, and I think people have the measure of it.

Phil Innes