This is a chess newsgroup Murray - if the dirty vicar here wants to snip
references and admonitions to him to discuss chess, and insist that others
are terrible, he would be just like any other flash newbie, and those who
never got past the very self-satisfied clever level... but then he won't be
like you, and Brennan, will he, since that's all you do - and as you know,
there is safety in numbers. 'Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil.'
You'd better protest more, otherwise you'll lose him if he dared actually
talk chess. Do /you/ play, by the way? Do you like it?

You see, admonishing others to do things you don't do yourself is
hypocritical, whether you wear a dog-collar or a ten-gallon hat.

Phil Innes

"Mike Murray" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:32:26 -0800, "J.D. Walker"
wrote:

Chess One wrote:

"J.D. Walker" wrote in message
. ..

I must say, Mr. Innes, that if this incident is typical of your
behavior
in the past, I begin to understand how you acquired the unsavory
reputation that I frequently see referenced in this news group.


Seek and you shall find!

insults deleted

I see. It is not too late to reform your ways...

Good point, Rev.

If only Phil would apologize to the group, admit he's substituted
bombast for reasoned discourse, promise to conduct rationally these
discussions in the future, eschew exhibitionist use of foreign
phrases, and, last but not least, commit to a spell-checker, we'd
welcome him back into the communion of chess fans.

Redemption is possible. We should remember that.