On Nov 16, 10:06 pm, help bot wrote:
On Nov 16, 3:39 pm, William Hyde wrote:

I agree with Mr.
Laurie that the implication can be found in what NM
Kingston wrote,

There you have it, one and all, in black and white, Larry
Parr claims that Kingston is an NM!

Mr. Parr would not know the difference between
an NM and a BM, or even an RN, so who cares?

The entire result of his "attack", after years of work,
only managed to drop TK from 2300+ down to 2250
or thereabouts -- still well into NM territory; LP is an
embarrassment to self-respecting ad hominsts
everywhere.

And congratulations, Larry. It takes a big man to do that.

I take it you saw the photo of Mr. Parr obstructing
pedestrians on the Great Wall. Not to worry: it's
solid stone, so it easily could hold up ten Larry Parrs.

Now, if we can just get Neil Brennan to assert that Phil was rated
2400+, we can dump this absurd credentialism forever.

Ah-- you appear to have fallen for the Nearly's
ploy of edging his boast downward over time! The
number was 2450 -- not a farthing less. He also
laid claim to the nearly-an-IM title, which of course
means he was either a very weak GM or else a
very strong FM (I give him the benefit of the doubt,
going with the super-FM impersonation).

The only thing the Evans ratpackers have going
for them is their chess champion, Sam Sloan.
What they lack in honesty and intellect, SS
makes up for in swash, buckle and style. Who
else would dare pay hundreds of dollars to enter
a tournament like the World Open, then play
2. ...f6 as if throwing his games on purpose?
Who else could soundly(?) defeat Bill Brock in
a grudge match? Who else knows every
illegitimate descendant of Thomas Jefferson?
Or can defeat the Supreme Court sans any
help from a real lawyer? Only one man can:
Sam Sloan!

-- help bot

I will have you know that I won all three of my games with black at
the World Open that started with 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 f6 !

Sam Sloan