On Nov 24, 6:50 pm, help bot wrote:
On Nov 24, 9:42 am, trfss wrote:





-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Paul truong's mistake was visiting anusha.com in 2005.
He believed is was just a music player that loaded.
Without knowing it he installed a backdoor trojan.
His laptop began to broadcast for the Real Fake Sam Sloan.
Until bm took the bait when the trojan was self-erased.
Poor paul.
Almost no one believes he is a or the Fake Fake Sam Sloan.
Except for the Real Fake Sam Sloan.
Who finally gets a piece of polgar, denied him in the 80s.
"It has been known to happen that someone has impersonated
someone else impersonating someone else, and two of the
someone elses could be the same person."
I wrote it so he knows I know they know I know she didn't.
Do I know because I am the Real Fake Sam Sloan?
Or because I saw that at least 4 of the 2601 posts by the
Real Fake Sam Sloan that seemed to come from the Fake Fake
Sam Sloan contained facts only the Real Sam Sloan knew,
unless the Real Sam Sloan also had an insecure computer
which we know like most things is not the truth.
Was this because the Real Fake Sam Sloan was careless?
Was this because he wants to get caught?
Was this because it amuses him that no one will notice?
Even attorneys like pr can understand that if the Fake Sam
Sloan wrote something only the Real Sam Sloan would know
and the Fake Fake Sam Sloan could not know then the Real
Fake Sam Sloan must inevitably be the Fake Real Sam Sloan
and that is a sounder defense than arguing jurisdiction.
If chin will not be able to understand, zsuzsa might be
compelled to support the Real Fake Sam Sloan's *******s
or the Fake Real Sam Sloan's by-blows who are the same.
If you want to know all about this gang of 4 -

Good try. But you're not fooling anyone, kiddo.

We all know that the real SS has no time for such
nonsense as impersonating himself, since it is a
full time job *promoting himself* and gaining attention
here. What has truly "erased itself" is logic, as in
the many apologists for the Fake Sloan seem to be
unable to come up with rational answers to simple
questions. Even dull-witted SS himself has noticed
some freaky facts, like the Fake Sloan's peculiar
obsession with top-class women's chess. As you may
know, the real SS cannot help but obsess over other
topics, like sex with youngsters, the slave-children
of T.J., and idiotic chess openings, but it seems the
Fake Sloan is not interested in such things.

In any case, the excuse that a trojan erased itself in
an effort to implicate "victim" PT, is a bit lame. Trojans
I have known don't care a whit about PT; they are dead
on neutral on chess players, but dislike Geeks for some
reason. Here is an exact quote: "Beware of Geeks
bearing gifts! Beware of ackilleze".

-- help bot- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

help bot,

Some at least look for evidence to base conclusions on rather than
speculative theories. I'm sure there are many other theories to
explain what has happened based on speculation rather than facts and
evidence. It is convenient that any evidence that might support this
claim has been completely self-erased. Should we assume the claim is
true because of an inability or refusal of others to present
convincing evidence to the contrary? In my view that may only be a
diversion based on wishful thinking.

Regards,
Wayne Praeder