On Nov 29, 2:56 am, help bot wrote:
On Nov 29, 3:26 am, samsloan wrote:

Do you recall all the sarcastic remarks and jokes that were made by
board members about my lawsuit when it was first filed? They do not
seem to be joking about it any more, do they?
NOw they just say it to your face.


Here, let me check: Stand still, Mr. Sloan! I need to get
*behind your back* so I can hear what they are saying
about you.






Even though the Fake Sam Sloan issue was the biggest and most
immediate issue that brought about my lawsuit, it was not the only
issue. There are about 50 small lawsuits in there.

The "shotgun" approach to legal matters is usually a reflection on the
cluttered mind that produced it and is nearly never successful.

For example, the continuing losses of over two million dollars, the
funny money accounting, the loss, misplacement or destruction of the
financial records, the pension/profit sharing irregularities, the
failure to post tapes or transcripts of the board meetings as required
by the by-laws, the exclusion of Bobby Fischer which is a violation of
the by-laws, the illegal sale of the building in New Windsor and the
refusal of the board to retain counsel and seek legal advice both
concening the sale of the building in New Windsor, the move to
Crossville and building a new building on land we do not really have
clear title to in Crossville, and the moderation of the USCF Issues
Forum where discussion of these important issues facing the federation
has often not been allowed.

ANd the cost of having to defend against a serial litigant as you are
doesn't help the bottom line either, does it?


These are just a few of the many issues that are raised by my lawsuit.


Yes, well it sounds like you need a class action lawsuit,
since you were hardly the only victim with regard to those
charges.
Does MDP qualify someone for a class actions suit? DOes that me the
litigants would be "Me, Myself, and I"?

Many of these issues go back years and were raised by me repeatedly
during my election campaign and my one year on the board. No progress
was being made on any of these issues. It was all just being swept
under the rug. If some progress was being made I would not have found
it necessary to bring a lawsuit over this.

Like a spurned lover dragging raking through the ashes of of burnt
emotions to rehash issues long since dead or forgotten to maintain
contact with the suitor?


Translation: the lawsuit is "payback", or retaliation.

Were this turned around, your "employer" could get
into big trouble for suggesting such behavior.



Several of the board members would be doing the membership a big favor
if they would just resign and not come here any more.

So why didn't you resign instead of running for office again? Can't
follow your own advice?

Quick: let's fill in those vacancies by appointing
IM Innes and Rob "da robber" Mitchell until a proper
election can be held!

'Bot, I prefer "Which-Mitch or Lex Luthor" :-)

Our executive
director is utterly worthless. Bill is a terrible president. Channing
does nothing but talk about how great he is.

Seems you supported them before just as you sang Niro's praises until
he wouldn't let you manipulate him.

What a waste! Let the peons all talk about how
great he is, to free him up so he can go back to
doing great things.


The only board members
who are not tainted in some way are Randy Bauer

You atacked him and now you praise him? Make up your mind.

Mr. Bauer can't even think straight; he imagines,
for instance, that he can take Larry Evans in a
chess match -- without odds!


and Jim Berry. The rest of them should leave now.

WHy Jim?

Who decided that Mr. Sloan gets to dictate who
stays and who goes? I say it should be up to Rob
"da robber" Mitchell and Sanny to decide.


Lex Luthor Mitchell
-- help bot- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -