View Single Post
  #6  
Old November 30th 07, 01:39 AM posted to rec.games.chess.politics, rec.games.chess.misc, soc.org.nonprofit,misc.legal, alt.accounting
jkh001@aim.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 710
Default Pin the tail on the Sloan



samsloan wrote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by nolan
You made the statement:

Quote:
If employees could be board members and run the organization
then all corporations would convert to not-for-profit status, just to
avoid the payment of taxes.

You should explain what you mean. Corporations cannot convert to not-
for-profit status just because they want it, they have to meet the
IRS's requirements for the type of not-for-profit status they're
applying for.

And I don't see where employees being on the Board has any relevance
here.

If you do not see the relevance, then kindly explain why every not-for-
profit corporation has a rule that employees cannot be a member of the
board.

Sam Sloan



Already refuted. Somehow Sloan didn't get around to crosspostingit.

Mike Nolan wrote:

Not every not-for-profit has that rule, nor is it required under
Illinois law.

The Illinois Attorney General has a web page with advice for board
members of not-for-profits (http://
www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/ ... teers.html) which includes this:

"If a board member is also an employee, compensation can be paid
but the employee/board member should not participate in setting his or
her compensation."
Ads
 

Online Advertising - Free Advertising - Mortgages - Loans - Loans