samsloan wrote:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nolan
You made the statement:
Quote:
If employees could be board members and run the organization
then all corporations would convert to not-for-profit status, just to
avoid the payment of taxes.
|
You should explain what you mean. Corporations cannot convert to not-
for-profit status just because they want it, they have to meet the
IRS's requirements for the type of not-for-profit status they're
applying for.
And I don't see where employees being on the Board has any relevance
here.
|
If you do not see the relevance, then kindly explain why every not-for-
profit corporation has a rule that employees cannot be a member of the
board.
Sam Sloan
Already refuted. Somehow Sloan didn't get around to crosspostingit.
Mike Nolan wrote:
Not every not-for-profit has that rule, nor is it required under
Illinois law.
The Illinois Attorney General has a web page with advice for board
members of not-for-profits (http://
www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/ ... teers.html) which includes this:
"If a board member is also an employee, compensation can be paid
but the employee/board member should not participate in setting his or
her compensation."