View Single Post
  #12  
Old December 7th 07, 12:19 PM posted to rec.games.chess.misc
David Richerby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,514
Default Is it a good potential?

Kenneth Sloan wrote:
David Richerby wrote:
There's no time requirement, so you could, *in theory*, obtain your
2500 rating aged six, then fall down to 1000, and win three GM
tournaments over fifty years and you'd still qualify as a GM, even if
you were still rated under 2500. Of course, that's extremely
unlikely. :-)


I was under the impression that the rating requirement was as of the
date the title was granted. Did that change? Or, did I just have it
wrong all the time?


The wording of the FIDE regulation is `achieved at some time or other
a rating [of 2500]'. It then goes on to explain that the rating
doesn't have to have been published and could even have occurred only
in the middle of a tournament: therefore, it doesn't have to be
current when the title is granted.

I've no idea if this has changed but I don't think it's changed in the
last few years.


Dave.

--
David Richerby Pickled Accelerated Newspaper (TM):
www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~davidr/ it's like a daily broadsheet but
it's twice as fast and preserved
in vinegar!
Ads
 

The eBay Song - Loans - Remortgages - Bikini Babes - Area rugs