On Dec 19, 6:44 pm, "David Kane" wrote:

There is nothing significantly wrong with the rules.

Um, at the top you listed some significant problems
with the rules; now you bleat that there are no such
problems.

If you were capable of reading and understanding,
I explained exactly why the rules against drawing
aren't a problem. They aren't taken seriously.

Please give a link to the "survey" where this was
determined. (BTW, nobody I know was tallied.)


Moreover, enforcement of these rules make no
difference. They are simply an irrelevancy to
the points that I am making.

I wasn't aware that you made any points at all;
the vast majority of your commentary here has
been identified as ad hominem and/or insults.

Of course, I haven't read everything.


Look, kid: you can't have it both ways;
either there is, or there isn't anything wrong with the
rules, okay? Get a grip. The plonker-dude could
explain precisely which fallacy or other error category
this falls under,

The plonker dude simply didn't understand
the meaning of the various fallacies. I'd be
happy to give you a tutorial if you'd like.

LOL! You are soooo ludicrous! I think he
may have put a bit too much effort into his
work; perfect classification of fallacies is
neigh well impossible, because of all the
overlaps and redundancies. But by and
large, he pegged your swill for what it was.

Perhaps a Louis Blair could even present
a graph, showing the percentage of insults
compared to the percentage of ad hom.,
and how it varies over time-- but it's way too
much work for most folks to tackle.

Pulling "survey results" out of thin air is
not a very convincing way of making a point.
It reminds me of the old guard propaganda
style of Larry Parr (again). IMO, it would be
more effective if you wrote that /in your
opinion/, nobody takes certain rules
seriously; that's because at least then your
comments would have an air of objectivity.

Still, with 90%+ garbage, who is going to
work to sort out any wheat from all that chaff?
(Even the hard-working plonker guy gave up.)


-- help bot